This article will once again DEBUNK Sam Shamoun's desperate attempts to refute theirrefutable points that I posted on my site regarding the sick Bible's pedophilia with3-year old girls; YES 3-YEAROLD GIRLS! (you literally sometimes have to readthings TWICE to believe them!!). It will also expose Shamoun's deliberateLIES that he fabricated about me, my points and my site. He will once again beproven without doubt that he is truly the biggest clown from among the team of liars,"answering Islam". To get a feel of how much of a true clown Shamounreally is, please visit:
child porn stories 8 year Old Girl pedo porn children cumshot Sex with my child 311
Below, we will see just how much of a total hypocrite Shamoun truly is for making up lies against Islam and for so biasely and ridiculously covering up for his horny and pornful bible's real pedophilia (forcing 3-year old slave girls into sex) and degradation to women for allowing fathers to sell off their daughters to men beyond the daughters' will.
Also at the very end of this article, you'll see how I completely humiliated Shamoun by exposing his hypocrisy about calling the Noble Quran "filthy porn" (only cheap shots with nothing to support it), while ignoring the ample pedophilia and x-rated pornography in his pornful bible.
"Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal? And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book (i.e., the Bible), but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' To traffic with it for a miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:77-79)" This article will also expose the 'Answering Islam' team's hypocrisy for being very quickto claim that Islam is a lie and Prophet Muhammad is a false Prophet and pedophile for MARRYING(not raping) a 9-year old girl whose parents agreed to her marriage and all of the Arabsback then pagans and Muslims (Isaiah 56:5: Muslim is the future believers' name. Sons and daughters titles will be "no more") agreed too by showing no objections! The reason no oneobjected to the marriage was because:
First of all, I never said "all of the Prophets". Second, when I saidthe word "married", I meant for it to also include the slave-girls who they hadsex with. Like for instance, Solomon's son Rehoboam had 86 children (28 sons and 60 daughters). Obviously this big number of children did not come from one or two or three wives. They had to come from many wives:
R. Nahman bar Isaac said. "They made the decree that a gentile child should be deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [described at Lev.15], so that an Israelite child should not hang around with him and commit pederasty [as he does]." For said R. Zira, "I had much anguish with R. Assi, and R. Assi with R. Yohanan, and R. Yohanan with R. Yannai, and R. Yannai with R. Nathan b. Amram, and R. Nathan b. Amram with Rabbi [on this matter]: 'From what age is a gentile child deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [described at Lev.15]'? And he said to me, 'On the day on which he is born.' But when I came to R. Hiyya, he said to me, 'From the age of nine years and one day.' And when I came and laid the matter before Rabbi, he said to me, 'Discard my reply and adopt that of R. Hiyya, who declared, "From what age is a gentile child deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [described at Lev.15]? From the age of nine years and one day."' [37A] Since he is then suitable for having sexual relations, he also is deemed unclean with the flux uncleanness [of Lev.15]." Said Rabina, "Therefore a gentile girl who is three years and one day old, since she is then suitable to have sexual relations, also imparts uncleanness of the flux variety." That is self-evident! Abodah Zarah 36B-37A [133]
Also, the idea of "natural part of childbirth" is a lie, since the whole pornful book, as clearly shown in the ampleverses above and below, is speaking about sex and brothers and sisters and lovers havingsex with each others all night long. No children and child birth was ever mentioned,and
Filthy porn? All of the pedophilia and x-rated pornography in your pornful and pedophilic bible ARENOT considered "filthy porn", but Allah Almighty saying that He blew His Spiritthrough Mary to form Jesus (as He, the Almighty, does with every human-fetus according to Noble Verse32:9), and Paradise will have big-breasted virgins in it is filthyporn to you?
_rece.htmQuotation: "...the Satan-chasers' incredible claims are distinguished by anutter lack of evidence, except for the rantings elicited from'victims' by dubious psychotherapists and church counselors." MarkSauer, movie review of "By Satan Possessed."Overview:There is a growing belief among mental health professionals thatbelief in the existence of:Ritual Abuse (RA),Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA),Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), andDissociative Identity Disorder (DID)are largely derived from false memories which, in turn, are largelygenerated by suggestive Recovered Memory Therapy (RMT) techniques.They are unrelated to real events from the past.This website was started up in 1995, at the time when beliefs in RA,SRA, MPD and DID started to decline after having captured the public'sattention and acceptance since the early 1980s.These four belief systems involve:Satanic Ritual Abuse is the psychological, sexual, and/or physicalassault forced on an unwilling victim and committed by one or moreSatanists according to a prescribed ritual, the primary aim of whichis to fulfill the need to worship the Christian devil, Satan. Sincethe mid 1990s, belief in SRA has been in rapid decline, largelybecause of the complete lack of hard evidence that SRA has everexisted.Ritual Abuse (RA) is similar to SRA, except that the perpetrators arenot motivated by Satanic belief; they are following another religion.Although there is hard evidence of Christian Ritual Abuse (CRA) in theform of exorcisms involving physical assault and occasional homicide,other forms of ritual abuse appear to be very rare or non-existent.Multiple Personality Disorder (now generally called DissociativeIdentity Disorder) is a belief that a single person can be the host oftwo or more discrete alters or individual personalities. There is agrown belief that MPD and DID are iatrogenic disorders -- caused bythe physician or therapist in conjunction with the client. It does notseem to exist in nature.Recovered Memory Therapy is a form of counseling that rapidly declinedacross North American in the 1990s. It involves suggestive forms oftherapy including hypnotism, guided imagery, dream analysis, etc. Itappears to be an effective method of transferring the beliefs of thetherapist to the client without either being aware of the process. Theclient often develops false memories of events that never happened. Ifthe therapist is a enthusiastic supporter of SRA, then the client maywell recovers memories of SRA; if the therapist believes that MPD/DIDis widespread in society, then her/his clients may develop MPD/DID.And so with other belief systems such as abuse in former lifetimes,abuse onboard UFOs, ritual abuse within Masonic and similar men'sorganizations, etc.Belief in SRA, RA, RMT, MPD/DID has been in serious decline since1995. We expect that, by the year 2010, they be generally recognizedto have been a cruel hoaxes, harming tens of thousands of adultclients who were victimized by recovered memory therapy hurtingthousands of children who were subjected to incompetent interviewtechniques, and triggering hundreds of suicides.
"Patients with DID report having severe physical and sexual abuse,especially during childhood.""reports of patients with DID are often validated by objectiveevidence""In conclusion, despite its long and controversial past, there hasbeen a wealth of research accumulate over the past 10 to 15 years onthe DID diagnosis. This research seems to establish the validity ofthe DID diagnosis."
information and DID resources - -information-on-didmpd/From the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychological Association (2000).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed. textrevision).Washington, D. C .)DID is defined in the DSM-IV-TR as the presence of two or morepersonality states or distinct identities that repeatedly take controlof one's behavior. The patient has an inability to recall personalinformation. The extent of this lack of recall is too great to beexplained by normal forgetfulness. The disorder cannot be due to thedirect physical effects of a general medical condition or substance.DID entails a failure to integrate certain aspects of memory,consciousness and identity. Patients experience frequent gaps in theirmemory for their personal history, past and present. Patients with DIDreport having severe physical and sexual abuse, especially duringchildhood. There is controversy around these reports, becausechildhood memories may be exposed to distortion and some patients withDID are highly hypnotizable and vulnerable to suggestive influences.But, the reports of patients with DID are often validated by objectiveevidence. People that are responsible for acts of sexual and physicalabuse may be prone to distorting or denying their behavior.Physical evidence may include variations in physiological functions indifferent identity states, including differences in vision, levels ofpain tolerance, symptoms of asthma, the response of blood glucose toinsulin and sensitivity to allergens. Other physical findings mayinclude scars from physical abuse or self-inflicted injuries,headaches or migraines, asthma and irritable bowel syndrome.DID is found in a variety of cultures around the world. It isdiagnosed three to nine times more often in adult females than males.Females average 15 or more identities, males eight identities. Thesharp rise in the reported cases of DID in the U.S. may be due thegreater awareness of DID's diagnosis, which has caused an increasedidentification of those that were previously undiagnosed. Othersbelieve it has been overdiagnosed in those that are highlysuggestible.The average time period from DID's first presentation of symptoms toits diagnosis is six to seven years. DID may become less manifest aspatients reach past their late 40's, but it can reemerge duringstress, trauma or substance abuse. It is suggested in several studiesthat DID is more likely to occur with first-degree biologicalrelatives of people that already have DID, than in the regularpopulation.for responses to those that state that DID is iatrogenic or a socialconstructsee -information-on-didmpd/Delineates the etiological antecedents of Dissociative IdentityDisorder (DID) and enumerates upon the scientific evidence proving theexistence of DID. This paper explains the diagnostic criteria of DID,its incidence rates and cross-cultural characteristics, presentarguments to counter the idea that suggestibility may be a factor inits misdiagnosis and delineate the data that shows a clear connectionbetween traumatic wartime experiences and dissociation and trauma andDID. It considers the historical development of the debate surroundingDID, including its increased diagnosis around the turn of the lastcentury, reasons for its decline in diagnosis in the mid part of thelast century and reasons for its increased diagnosis toward the end ofthe 20th century. It deliberates upon the claims made by severalresearchers that DID can be created in the laboratory as well as thecritiques surrounding those claims. It discusses the neurobiologicalevidence proving the connection between DID and certainneurobiological indicators. Included is a discussion of the moderntheory of iatrogenic DID and a critique of this theory. A debate aboutthe creation of DID as a social construction and critiques of thistheory are presented as well. It concludes, by presenting the argumentthat the research on DID shows it to be a valid psychiatric diagnosiswhich robustly meets all the necessary validity requirements. -etymological-antecedents-of-and-scientific-evidence-for-the-existence-of-dissociative-identity-disorder/Describes the methods and criteria used for diagnosing and assessingDissociative Identity Disorder (DID). The symptoms and etiology of DIDare discussed. The use of client histories, different psychologicaltests and the test results of different test items are discussed interms of their applicability to a diagnosis, as well as their validityand reliability. Differential diagnoses and their effect on thediagnosis of DID are enumerated upon. The dissociative spectrum andritual abuse are discussed briefly, in order to help clarify thesymptomology and etiology of DID. -diagnosis-and-assessment-of-dissociative-identity-disorder/Dissociation and Trauma Archives - Full text searchable articles andcase studies published in the 1800s and early 1900s. examination of the diagnostic validity of dissociative identitydisorder. Gleaves DH, May MC, Cardeña EWe review the empirical evidence for the validity of the DissociativeIdentity Disorder (DID) diagnosis, the vast majority of which has comefrom research conducted within the last 10 years. After reviewingthree different guidelines to establish diagnostic validity, weconclude that considerable converging evidence supports the inclusionof DID in the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for MentalDisorders. For instance, DID appears to meet all of the guidelines forinclusion and none of the exclusion guidelines; proposed by Blashfieldet al.[Comprehensive Psychiatry 31 (1990) 15-19], and it is one of thefew disorders currently supported by taxometric research. However, wealso discuss possible problems with the current diagnostic criteriaand offer recommendations, based on recent research, for possiblerevisions to these criteria. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001 Jun;21(4):577-608."In conclusion, despite its long and controversial past, there hasbeen a wealth of research accumulate over the past 10 to 15 years onthe DID diagnosis. This research seems to establish the validity ofthe DID diagnosis." pubmed abstract , B. A.; Greaves, B. G., Coons M. P. (1994). Multiplepersonality and dissociation, 1791-1992: a complete bibliography.Lutherville, MD: The Sidran Press, 85. ISBN 0-9629164-5-5. is abibliography. It contains the 1st edition as well as updates throughNovember 30, 1993. Article errors have been corrected when possible.The bibliography is divided up into the following areas: Multiplepersonalities, Dissociation and Amnesia, Depersonalization andDerealization, Fugue States, and Medico-legal Aspects. Sidran Press.2nd Edition. - University of Oregon Libraries - -bin/showfile.exe?CISOROOT=/diss&CISOPTR=38&filename=39.pdfInternational Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation -d.orgUnited States of Tara - Learn More About D.I.D. - Showtime supportsthe awareness for Dissociative Identity Disorder with Richard P. KluftMD =1847322218&bclid=5253538001&bctid=6803420001 2ff7e9595c
Comments